vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Challenging B(s)→ D(s)(∗ ) form factors with the heavy quark expansion

2025/11/11 by Marzia Bordone, Nico Gubernari, Martin Jung +1
Physics and Astronomy · #High-Energy Particle Collisions Research #Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies #Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions

paper · pdf · doi:10.1007/jhep11(2025)051

openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex publication_date 2025/11/11 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/01

Abstract

A bstract Recent publications by three lattice QCD collaborations have provided an unprecedented wealth of theoretical predictions for the Bq→ Dq(∗ ) <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mover> <mml:mi>B</mml:mi> <mml:mo>¯</mml:mo> </mml:mover> <mml:mi>q</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>→</mml:mo> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>D</mml:mi> <mml:mi>q</mml:mi> <mml:mfenced> <mml:mo>∗</mml:mo> </mml:mfenced> </mml:msubsup> </mml:math> form factors, for spectator flavours q = u / d and q = s . We analyse these predictions within the framework of the heavy-quark expansion (HQE) to order α s , 1/ m b , and 1/mc2 <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>m</mml:mi> <mml:mi>c</mml:mi> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:msubsup> </mml:math> . For the first time, our analysis imposes unitarity bounds for all of the Bq(∗ )→ Dq(∗ ) <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mover> <mml:mi>B</mml:mi> <mml:mo>¯</mml:mo> </mml:mover> <mml:mi>q</mml:mi> <mml:mfenced> <mml:mo>∗</mml:mo> </mml:mfenced> </mml:msubsup> <mml:mo>→</mml:mo> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>D</mml:mi> <mml:mi>q</mml:mi> <mml:mfenced> <mml:mo>∗</mml:mo> </mml:mfenced> </mml:msubsup> </mml:math> form factors; this includes newly identified tensor form factors arising in Bq→ Dq(∗ ) <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mover> <mml:mi>B</mml:mi> <mml:mo>¯</mml:mo> </mml:mover> <mml:mi>q</mml:mi> <mml:mo>∗</mml:mo> </mml:msubsup> <mml:mo>→</mml:mo> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>D</mml:mi> <mml:mi>q</mml:mi> <mml:mfenced> <mml:mo>∗</mml:mo> </mml:mfenced> </mml:msubsup> </mml:math> . This enables us to treat all form factors in the same fashion. At the level of our present analysis, the inclusion of the tensor bounds is not yet constraining the HQE parameter space. We find the lattice QCD results to be well compatible with each other in a joint HQE fit as well as with QCD sum rule estimates that were used in previous HQE analyses. This is in contrast to the strong variability of the posterior predictions, in particular of the form factors ratios R 0 and R 2 . Using the posterior distributions of our HQE analysis, we provide predictions for angular observables and LFU ratios in the Bq→ Dq(∗ )-ν <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mover> <mml:mi>B</mml:mi> <mml:mo>¯</mml:mo> </mml:mover> <mml:mi>q</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>→</mml:mo> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>D</mml:mi> <mml:mi>q</mml:mi> <mml:mfenced> <mml:mo>∗</mml:mo> </mml:mfenced> </mml:msubsup> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>ℓ</mml:mi> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> </mml:msup> <mml:mover> <mml:mi>ν</mml:mi> <mml:mo>¯</mml:mo> </mml:mover> </mml:math> decays.

Citations

Related