2010/07/01 by Thomas P. Lyon, Haitao Yin · 1 citation
Economics, Econometrics and Finance · Energy · #Climate Change Policy and Economics #Economic and Environmental Valuation #Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
paper · doi:10.5547/issn0195-6574-ej-vol31-no3-7
openalex publication_date 2010/07/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/25
Renewable portfolio standards (RPSs) for electricity generation are politically popular in many U.S. states although economic analysis suggests they are not first-best policies. We present an empirical analysis of the political and economic factors that drive state governments to adopt an RPS, and the factors that lead to the inclusion of in-state requirements given the adoption of an RPS. Although advocates claim an RPS will stimulate job growth, we find that states with high unemployment rates are slower to adopt an RPS. Local environmental conditions and preferences have no significant effect on the timing of adoption. Overall, RPS adoption seems to be driven more by political ideology and private interests than by local environmental and employment benefits, raising questions as to when environmental federalism serves the public interest.