Legal Analysis of the Interpretation of Adapted Physical Education in US Law

2024/08/29 by Scott W. T. McNamara, Scott McNamara, Wesley J. Wilson +2
Health Professions · Social Sciences · #Disability Rights and Representation #Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport #Physical Education and Pedagogy

paper · doi:10.1080/09362835.2024.2396110

openalex publication_date 2024/08/29 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/25

Abstract

The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) is a cornerstone of special education and mandates for physical education (PE) and adapted physical education (APE). Little is known about how these areas are interpreted within court cases. We employed a legal content analysis to examine the interpretation of IDEA in state and federal court cases related to PE and APE. Among the seven cases examined, schools were identified as the prevailing party in most cases. Cases highlighted the significance of proper documentation of PE and APE, the limited involvement of trained adapted physical educators, and misconceptions surrounding PE and APE. Findings underscore the gap between legal interpretations and academic understanding of PE and APE within IDEA.

Citations

• Childhood Obesity: The Health Issue

Related

• Strategies to Increase Self-, Student, and Discipline Advocacy in Adapted Physical Education
• Evolving Interpretations of Educational Equity and Students with Disabilities
• Unpacking the Logic of Compliance in Special Education: Contextual Influences on Discipline Racial Disparities in Suburban Schools
• The Cost of School Vouchers: 14th Amendment Pathways to Protect Disability Rights
• Special Education Policy Prospects: Lessons From Social Policies Past