2026/05/15 by Jeffrey Shu, Hannah Wang, Anisha Misra +4 · 1 voice
Immunology and Microbiology · Medicine · #Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research #Medical Device Sterilization and Disinfection #Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
paper · pdf · doi:10.1017/ice.2026.10464
openalex publication_date 2026/05/15 · openalex created_date 2026/05/16 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/27
INTRODUCTION: Expanded multiplex PCR gastrointestinal panels (GIPs) are routinely ordered to diagnose infectious diarrhea. However, recommendations for repeat GIP testing are limited, resulting in variable testing practices. We evaluated the diagnostic yield of repeat GIP testing within 14 days. METHODS: results. Repeat testing was defined as a GIP completed within 14 days of an index GIP, excluding confirmatory testing using the same stool sample. The primary outcome was diagnostic yield (new pathogen detection), and the secondary outcome was pathogen persistence (same pathogen detection). RESULTS: Among 16,502 patients, 507 (3.1%) underwent repeat GIP testing within 14 days (median interval: 6.3 days; IQR: 2.7-9.8). Only 4.6% [19/415] index-negative patients and 2.2% [2/92] index-positive patients detected new pathogens on repeat testing, with 51% [47/92] index-positive patients demonstrating persistence of at least one pathogen from their initial test. The number needed to test (NNT) to identify one new pathogen was 24 (95% CI: 16-39) tests overall, and 127 (95% CI: 50-455) tests to identify one new pathogen warranting antimicrobial treatment. Most repeat testing (86% [436/507]) was ordered by a different clinician. DISCUSSION: Repeat GIP testing within 14 days rarely provided new diagnostic information, highlighting the limited utility of early repeat testing. Institutional policies discouraging repeat GIPs within 14 days may improve diagnostic stewardship.