2021/06/18 by Gregory W. McGarr, Kelli E. King, Samah Saci +4
Environmental Science · Medicine · #Climate Change and Health Impacts #Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control #Thermoregulation and physiological responses
paper · pdf · doi:10.1113/ep089671
openalex publication_date 2021/06/18 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/01
New Findings What is the central question of this study? Are regional differences in nitric oxide (NO)‐dependent cutaneous vasodilatation during local skin heating present in young adults? What is the main finding and its importance? NO‐dependent cutaneous vasodilatation varied across the body. The abdomen demonstrated larger NO contributions, while the chest demonstrated smaller NO contributions, compared to other regions. This exploratory work is an important first step in characterizing regional heterogeneity of cutaneous microvascular control across the torso and limbs. Equally, it serves to generate hypotheses for future studies examining regional cutaneous microvascular control in ageing and disease. Abstract Regional variations in cutaneous vasodilatation during local skin heating exist across the body. While nitric oxide (NO) is a well‐known modulator of this response, the extent of regional differences in NO‐dependent cutaneous vasodilatation during local skin heating remains uncertain. In 16 habitually active young adults (8 females; 25 ± 5 years), cutaneous vascular conductance, normalized to maximum vasodilatation (% CVC max ), was assessed at the upper chest, abdomen, dorsal forearm, thigh and lateral calf during local skin heating. Across all regions, local skin temperatures were simultaneously increased from 33 to 42°C (1°C per 10 s), and held until a stable heating plateau was achieved (∼40 min). Next, with local skin temperature maintained at 42°C, 20 mM of N G ‐nitro‐ l ‐arginine methyl ester ( l ‐NAME) was continuously infused at each site until a stable l ‐NAME plateau was achieved (∼40 min). The difference between heating and l ‐NAME plateaus was identified as the NO contribution for each region. There was no evidence for region‐specific responses at baseline ( P = 0.561), the heating plateau ( P = 0.351) or l ‐NAME plateau ( P = 0.082), but there was for the NO contribution ( P = 0.048). Overall, point estimates for between‐region differences in the NO contribution varied across the body from 0 to 19% CVC max . The greatest effects were observed for the abdomen, wherein the NO contribution was consistently greater than for the other regions (range: 9–19% CVC max ). The chest was consistently lower than the other regions (range: 7–19% CVC max ). The smallest effects were observed between limb regions (range: 0–2% CVC max ). These findings advance our understanding of the mechanisms influencing regional variations in the cutaneous vasodilator response to local skin heating in young adults.