2011/07/08 by Travis J. Carter, Melissa J. Ferguson, Ran R. Hassin · 1 voice · 1 citation
Neuroscience · Psychology · Social Sciences · #Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior #Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment #Social and Intergroup Psychology
paper · doi:10.1177/0956797611414726
openalex publication_date 2011/07/08 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/22
There is scant evidence that incidental cues in the environment significantly alter people's political judgments and behavior in a durable way. We report that a brief exposure to the American flag led to a shift toward Republican beliefs, attitudes, and voting behavior among both Republican and Democratic participants, despite their overwhelming belief that exposure to the flag would not influence their behavior. In Experiment 1, which was conducted online during the 2008 U.S. presidential election, a single exposure to an American flag resulted in a significant increase in participants' Republican voting intentions, voting behavior, political beliefs, and implicit and explicit attitudes, with some effects lasting 8 months after the exposure to the prime. In Experiment 2, we replicated the findings more than a year into the current Democratic presidential term. These results constitute the first evidence that nonconscious priming effects from exposure to a national flag can bias the citizenry toward one political party and can have considerable durability.