2017/03/17 by Daniel Kelly, Patrick Hoburg
Neuroscience · Psychology · Social Sciences · #Cultural Differences and Values #Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation #Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
paper · doi:10.1080/09515089.2017.1299857
openalex publication_date 2017/03/17 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2025/11/06
We situate Henrich’s book in the larger research tradition of which it is a part and show how he presents a wide array of recent psychological, physiological, and neurological data as supporting the view that two related but distinct processes have shaped human nature and made us unique: cumulative cultural evolution and culture-driven genetic evolution. We briefly sketch out several ways philosophers might fruitfully engage with this view and note some implications it may have for current philosophic debates in moral and political theory and over the nature of extended cognition. We end by noting how Henrich’s view of the source of cultural design and innovation, and the prominence of place he gives to the extended process of cultural evolution, cuts against a cluster of broad but common views about human minds, recasting putative bugs as features and indicating that many of the distinctive features of our individual minds evolved to allow them to be effective cogs in the larger, more productive cultural machine.