2025/05/01 by Amin Ghaziani, Jorge Magaña Ochoa · 1 voice
Agricultural and Biological Sciences · #Culinary Culture and Tourism
paper · doi:10.1177/3033371251329933
openalex publication_date 2025/05/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/06/04
To capture the complexity of the social world, researchers sometimes must color outside the lines, or break the mold of orthodox methods to bring under-examined phenomena into view. Queer nightlife is a case in point. It often takes forms that are fleeting, in flux, and which thus can seem empirically elusive. We argue that this complexity need not prompt methodological nihilism; it instead can serve as a catalyst for devising new approaches for research. In this spirit, we revisit two core questions. First: What counts as evidence? We propose that ethnography attuned to ephemerality enriches inferences about nightlife without reducing it to numerical trends. Second: How do we study change? We introduce a palimpsestic approach that equips researchers to examine the historical dynamism of nightlife. In our discussion of each question, we suggest that what appears as a chaotic, messy, and evasive object of study can in fact be rigorously characterized if we creatively recalibrate our methods. Across both sections, we offer methodological invitations from the study of queer nightlife which may prove broadly useful to researchers interested in ephemeral or changing social worlds.