Integrating Personality Structure, Personality Process, and Personality Development
2017/09/01 by Anna Baumert, Manfred Schmitt, Marco Perugini +18 · 20 citations
Psychology · #Mental Health Research Topics #Personality Traits and Psychology #Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
paper · doi:10.1002/per.2115
Abstract
In this target article, we argue that personality processes, personality structure, and personality development have to be understood and investigated in integrated ways in order to provide comprehensive responses to the key questions of personality psychology. The psychological processes and mechanisms that explain concrete behaviour in concrete situations should provide explanation for patterns of variation across situations and individuals, for development over time as well as for structures observed in intra–individual and inter–individual differences. Personality structures, defined as patterns of covariation in behaviour, including thoughts and feelings, are results of those processes in transaction with situational affordances and regularities. It cannot be presupposed that processes are organized in ways that directly correspond to the observed structure. Rather, it is an empirical question whether shared sets of processes are uniquely involved in shaping correlated behaviours, but not uncorrelated behaviours (what we term ‘correspondence’ throughout this paper), or whether more complex interactions of processes give rise to population–level patterns of covariation (termed ‘emergence’). The paper is organized in three parts, with part I providing the main arguments, part II reviewing some of the past approaches at (partial) integration, and part III outlining conclusions of how future personality psychology should progress towards complete integration. Working definitions for the central terms are provided in the appendix. Copyright © 2017 European Association of Personality Psychology
Citations
Cited by
- Descriptive, Predictive and Explanatory Personality Research: Different Goals, Different Approaches, but a Shared Need to Move beyond the Big Few Traits
- Interpersonal Dynamics in Personality and Personality Disorders
- Integrating Insights from Volitional Personality Change Interventions to Improve Self-Regulated Learning
- Network analysis of multivariate data in psychological science
- A Nomological Approach to Structuring Personality Characteristics and Their Measures: Grouping Big Five Facets by Similarities in Their Nomological Networks
- A tentative roadmap for consensus building processes
- Successful Explanations Start with Accurate Descriptions: Questionnaire Items as Personality Markers for More Accurate Predictions
- Getting from states to traits: Whole Trait Theory’s explanatory and developmental engine
- Developing, evaluating, and interpreting personality state measures: A framework based on the revised latent state-trait theory
- Epigenetic aging and personality differences: Latent change analyses of twin data
- Bridges over troubled water: A meta-analysis of the associations of character strengths with well-being and common mental health disorders
- Toward an Integrated Psychological Model of Violent Extremism
- Virtual personalities and neural networks: Capturing the structure and dynamics of personality
- Developing, evaluating, and interpreting personality state measures: A framework based on the revised latent state-trait theory
- Using multi-rater and test-retest data to detect overlap within and between psychological scales
- Psychometric Evaluation of a Big Five Personality State Scale for Intensive Longitudinal Studies
- Trouble when they walk in? Candidates, dark personality, and attack behavior in German televised debates
- Personality states
- Assessing Personality States: What to Consider when Constructing Personality State Measures
- Generative Framework for Personalized Persuasion: Inferring Causal, Counterfactual, and Latent Knowledge
Related