2026/01/19 by Syed Ali Hussain, S. E. Hussain, Mary Bresnahan · 1 voice
Arts and Humanities · Social Sciences · #Law, Rights, and Freedoms #Political Developments and Conflicts #Rhetoric and Communication Studies
paper · doi:10.1177/01968599251407625
openalex publication_date 2026/01/19 · openalex created_date 2026/01/20 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/22
Objective This study analyzed language found in executive orders (EOs) issued during the first 100 days of the Trump administration (2025) with specific emphasis on how word choice characterized federal and non-federal programs targeted for removal. Method Semantic and thematic analysis examined 36 EOs eliminating programs or freezing funding and the rationale offered for doing this. Findings Sentiment analysis revealed while the orders were predominantly positive, negative emotions focusing on anger, fear, and trust were common. A lexicon of 830 negative words and phrases in these documents was compiled. Four themes illustrating exclusion were identified. Arguments supporting these themes claimed that the 1) border was overrun by illegal immigrants, 2) other countries have taken unfair advantage of America's generosity, 3) diversity, equity, and inclusion is illegal, and 4) biological sex at birth is the legal standard. Conclusion While calling for restoration to a golden age, the overall impact of these orders describes the U.S. as a dumping ground for everybody else's problems.