A systematic review of research on empathy in health care
2022/06/29 by Ingrid M. Nembhard, Guy David, Iman Ezzeddine +4 · 26 citations
Medicine · Health Professions · Social Sciences · #Empathy and Medical Education #Ethics in medical practice #Cultural Competency in Health Care
paper · doi:10.1111/1475-6773.14016
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To summarize the predictors and outcomes of empathy by health care personnel, methods used to study their empathy, and the effectiveness of interventions targeting their empathy, in order to advance understanding of the role of empathy in health care and facilitate additional research aimed at increasing positive patient care experiences and outcomes. DATA SOURCE: We searched MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process, PsycInfo, and Business Source Complete to identify empirical studies of empathy involving health care personnel in English-language publications up until April 20, 2021, covering the first five decades of research on empathy in health care (1971-2021). STUDY DESIGN: We performed a systematic review in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Title and abstract screening for study eligibility was followed by full-text screening of relevant citations to extract study information (e.g., study design, sample size, empathy measure used, empathy assessor, intervention type if applicable, other variables evaluated, results, and significance). We classified study predictors and outcomes into categories, calculated descriptive statistics, and produced tables to summarize findings. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Of the 2270 articles screened, 455 reporting on 470 analyses satisfied the inclusion criteria. We found that most studies have been survey-based, cross-sectional examinations; greater empathy is associated with better clinical outcomes and patient care experiences; and empathy predictors are many and fall into five categories (provider demographics, provider characteristics, provider behavior during interactions, target characteristics, and organizational context). Of the 128 intervention studies, 103 (80%) found a positive and significant effect. With four exceptions, interventions were educational programs focused on individual clinicians or trainees. No organizational-level interventions (e.g., empathy-specific processes or roles) were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Empirical research provides evidence of the importance of empathy to health care outcomes and identifies multiple changeable predictors of empathy. Training can improve individuals' empathy; organizational-level interventions for systematic improvement are lacking.
Cited by
- Be kind. Use systems. Improve care
- Assessing empathy in healthcare services: a systematic review of South American healthcare workers' and patients' perceptions. [europepmc]
- Medical practitioner perspectives on AI in emergency triage. [europepmc]
- Measures of empathy and compassion: A scoping review. [europepmc]
- Patients' experiences of GP consultations following the introduction of the new GP contract in Scotland: a cross-sectional survey. [europepmc]
- Psychometric evaluation of the 'Jefferson Scale of Empathy' in a sample of nursing students in the United Kingdom. [europepmc]
- Substantial Increases in Healthcare Students' State Empathy Scores Owing to Participation in a Single Improvisation Session. [europepmc]
- Understanding Men's Lived Experience of Mental Distress Through Metaphors. [europepmc]
- The moderating role of emotional self-efficacy and gender in teacher empathy and inclusive education. [europepmc]
- Developing empathy in healthcare professions students: protocol of a mixed-methods non-controlled longitudinal intervention study. [europepmc]
- Genetics, Epigenetics, and the Environment: Are Precision Medicine, Provider Compassion, and Social Justice Effective Public Health Measures to Mitigate Disease Risk and Severity? [europepmc]
- Exploring Nursing Students' Experiences of Empathy and User Experiences in an Immersive Virtual Reality Simulation Game: Cross-Sectional Study. [europepmc]
- How obstetricians experience stillbirth and perinatal loss: a systematic review and meta-synthesis. [europepmc]
- Validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the Empathy Quotient- 8 in Turkish university students. [europepmc]
- Toward Safe and Ethical Implementation of Health Care Artificial Intelligence: Insights From an Academic Medical Center. [europepmc]
- Perceptions of Empathy Among Nursing Assistants in Long-Term Care Facilities: A Qualitative Study. [europepmc]
- Advice over empathy: a national cross-sectional examination of communication in united states dietetic education. [europepmc]
- Beyond Benchmarks: Evaluating Generalist Medical Artificial Intelligence With Psychometrics. [europepmc]
- Impact of a Training Programme on the Empathy Skills of Nursing Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Quasi-Experimental Study. [europepmc]
- "It Is a Vicious Circle": Experiences of People Living With Obesity and Chronic Pain: A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis (QES). [europepmc]
- Perceived barriers to timely diagnosis among Iranian women diagnosed with advanced breast cancer: a qualitative study. [europepmc]
- Acceptability and effectiveness of empathy-based provider training and community-level awareness activities on self-injectable contraceptive use in Niger, Lagos, and Oyo States, Nigeria: a mixed methods program evaluation. [europepmc]
- Patient satisfaction, willingness to revisit, and implications for dental clinic education: service quality perception in Jeddah, KSA. [europepmc]
- Factors Influencing Cultural Intelligence Among Nurses in Western Pacific Countries: A Cross-Sectional Study. [europepmc]
- The current state of defensive medicine and its association with empathy: a cross-sectional study among graduate students in Guangxi, China. [europepmc]
- What is Artificial Intelligence (AI) "Empathy"? A Study Comparing ChatGPT and Physician Responses on an Online Forum. [europepmc]
Related