The peer-review crisis: how to fix an overloaded system

2025/08/06 by David Adam · 1 voice · 8 citations
Decision Sciences · #Academic Publishing and Open Access

paper · doi:10.1038/d41586-025-02457-2

openalex publication_date 2025/08/06 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/23

Citations

• The strain on scientific publishing
• Fast & Fair peer review: a pilot study demonstrating feasibility of rapid, high-quality peer review in a biology journal

Cited by

• AI-Assisted Writing Is Growing Fastest Among Non-English-Speaking and Less Established Scientists
• Peer Review and AI: Your (Human) Opinion Is What Matters
• ReviewerToo: Should AI Join The Program Committee? A Look At The Future of Peer Review
• JID Innovations: 5-Years Old: Origins and Opportunities
• The Challenges of Scientific Publishing: An Editor‐In‐Chief's Perspective
• Improving peer review capacity and integrity in forestry journals
• APCs and citation impact of Gold OA articles authored by Ukrainian scholars before and during Russia's full-scale war against Ukraine (2020-2023)
• Peer review, the sick patient of science: Diagnosis and editorial measures in Biological Psychology

Discussions

• Excellent news piece in @nature.com providing an overview of ongoing discussions about the organization of peer review in funding allocation and scientific publishing doi.org/10.1038/d415.... @rorins [bsky, 10 points, 2 comments]