2023/11/14 by John Mullahy, Edward C. Norton · 1 voice · 5 citations
Economics, Econometrics and Finance · Mathematics · Social Sciences · #Income, Poverty, and Inequality #Monetary Policy and Economic Impact #Statistical Methods and Inference
paper · pdf · doi:10.1111/obes.12583
openalex publication_date 2023/11/14 · openalex created_date 2023/11/16 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/27
Abstract Applied economists often transform a dependent variable that is non‐negative and skewed with the natural log transformation, the inverse hyperbolic sine transformation, or power function. We show that these transformations separate the zeros from the positives such that the estimated parameters are related to those from a scaled linear probability model. The retransformed marginal effects and elasticities are sensitive to changes in a shape parameter, ranging in magnitude between those of an untransformed least squares regression and those of a scaled linear probability model. Instead of transforming the dependent variable with non‐negative outcomes that includes zeros, we recommend using a non‐transformed dependent variable, such as a two‐part model, untransformed linear regression, or Poisson.