Which Candidate Selection Method is the Most Democratic?

2009/01/01 by Gideon Rahat · 3 citations
Social Sciences · Business, Management and Accounting · #Electoral Systems and Political Participation #Political Influence and Corporate Strategies #Political Systems and Governance

paper · doi:10.1111/j.1477-7053.2008.01276.x

Abstract

Abstract This article suggests guidelines for identifying the ramifications of central elements of candidate selection methods for various democratic dimensions – participation, competition, representation and responsiveness – and analyses their possible role in supplying checks and balances. It proposes employing a three-stage candidate selection method: in the first stage a small committee appoints candidates to a shortlist; in the second stage a selected party agency may add or remove candidates using a special procedure (absolute majority vote, for example) and also ratify the re-adoption of incumbent candidates; and, finally, party members select candidates for safe seats or safe list positions among the proposed candidates. The article also recommends employing moderate requirements for candidacy; the use of a non-majoritarian voting method; and allowing the national centre a say in candidate selection.

Cited by

• Universal Party Primaries and General Election Outcomes: The Case of Uruguay (1999-2009)
• An Intra-Party Democracy Index: Theory, Design and A Demonstration
• The failure of mainstream parties and the impact of new challenger parties in France, Italy and Spain

Related

• Candidate selection methods and electoral performance in comparative perspective
• Inclusive or exclusive? Candidate selection methods do not affect descriptive representation
• Finding the One: Ease of Candidate Choices in High Information Open‐List PR Systems
• Advantageous candidates and the selection process
• Electoral Selection with Parties and Primaries