How do researchers generate scientific and societal impacts? Toward an analytical and operational framework

2018/02/01 by Pablo D’Este, Irene Ramos-Vielba, Richard Woolley +1 · 2 citations
Business, Management and Accounting · Decision Sciences · #Innovation and Knowledge Management #University-Industry-Government Innovation Models #scientometrics and bibliometrics research

paper · doi:10.1093/scipol/scy023

openalex publication_date 2018/02/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/29

Abstract

Models of research systems increasingly emphasize collaborations between networks of heterogeneous actors, to both produce knowledge and formulate interdisciplinary responses to societal challenges and market needs. In this context, researchers’ goals and practices are required to satisfy professional requirements for new scientific findings and societal demand for relevant knowledge. Researchers may need also to find ways to reconcile tensions between these two missions. This article proposes an analytical and operational framework that incorporates individual, organizational and process-context factors to explain distinct configurations of scientific and societal impacts from research. The framework emphasises the role of productive interactions with different nonacademic actors as a mechanism for reconciling the scientific and societal missions of research.

Citations

• Accounting for universities’ impact: using augmented data to measure academic engagement and commercialization by academic scientists
• The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review
• Science for the post-normal age
• Introducing 'productive interactions' in social impact assessment
• Measuring and assessing researcher mobility from CV analysis: the case of the Ramón y Cajal programme in Spain
• University–industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry?
• The TD Wheel: A heuristic to shape, support and evaluate transdisciplinary research
• The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations
• In good company: The influence of peers on industry engagement by academic scientists
• The Research Excellence Framework and the 'impact agenda': are we creating a Frankenstein monster?
• Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university–industry collaboration
• Research Portfolio Analysis in Science Policy: Moving from Financial Returns to Societal Benefits

Cited by

• Governing the trade-off between the co-production of actionable knowledge and academic publishing in transdisciplinary sustainability research
• How governments influence public health research: a scoping review