2024/06/03 by Craig McIntosh, Andrew Zeitlin · 1 voice
Social Sciences · Nursing · Environmental Science · #Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare #Child Nutrition and Water Access #Energy and Environment Impacts
paper · doi:10.1093/ej/ueae050
Abstract We develop a methodology to benchmark in-kind programs against cost-equivalent cash transfers. Our application compares a multi-dimensional child nutrition intervention to unconditional cash transfers, using randomised variation in transfer amounts and regression adjustment of expenditures to estimate impacts of cash transfers at identical cost as well as to estimate the return to increasing cash transfer amounts. While neither the in-kind program nor a cost-equivalent transfer costing 124 per household moves core child outcomes within a year, cash transfers create significantly greater consumption and asset accumulation. A larger cash transfer costing 517 substantially improves consumption and investment outcomes and drives modest improvements in dietary diversity and child growth.