2020/10/05 by Michael Rochlitz, Evgeniya Mitrokhina, Irina Nizovkina
Business, Management and Accounting · Social Sciences · #Corruption and Economic Development #Media Influence and Politics #Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
paper · pdf · doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2020.101957
openalex publication_date 2020/10/05 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/02
Are investors in electoral authoritarian regimes discriminated against for political activism? In this paper, we implement a simple experiment to test whether affiliation with the ruling party or the political opposition affects the probability that investors receive advice from investment promotion agencies in Russian regions. Between December 2016 and June 2017, we sent 1504 emails with a short question and a number of randomized treatments to 188 investment promotion agencies in 70 Russian regions. Although investment promotion agencies are nominally depoliticized in Russia, we find that switching the political affiliation of a potential investor from the opposition party “Yabloko” to the government party “United Russia” on average increases the chances to receive a reply by 30%. The effect strongly depends on regional levels of political competition, with higher levels of discrimination in regions that are less politically competitive.