vix.ing · top · new · best · stats

Reconstructive Visual Instruction Tuning

2024/10/12 by Haochen Wang, Wang, Haochen, Anlin Zheng +11 · 25 citations
Neuroscience · Social Sciences · #Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) #Computation and Language (cs.CL) #Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV) #Education and Technology Integration #FOS: Computer and information sciences #Machine Learning (cs.LG) #Tactile and Sensory Interactions

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.09575

openalex publication_date 2024/10/12 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28

Abstract

This paper introduces reconstructive visual instruction tuning (ROSS), a family of Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) that exploit vision-centric supervision signals. In contrast to conventional visual instruction tuning approaches that exclusively supervise text outputs, ROSS prompts LMMs to supervise visual outputs via reconstructing input images. By doing so, it capitalizes on the inherent richness and detail present within input images themselves, which are often lost in pure text supervision. However, producing meaningful feedback from natural images is challenging due to the heavy spatial redundancy of visual signals. To address this issue, ROSS employs a denoising objective to reconstruct latent representations of input images, avoiding directly regressing exact raw RGB values. This intrinsic activation design inherently encourages LMMs to maintain image detail, thereby enhancing their fine-grained comprehension capabilities and reducing hallucinations. Empirically, ROSS consistently brings significant improvements across different visual encoders and language models. In comparison with extrinsic assistance state-of-the-art alternatives that aggregate multiple visual experts, ROSS delivers competitive performance with a single SigLIP visual encoder, demonstrating the efficacy of our vision-centric supervision tailored for visual outputs.

Cited by

Related