Rebuttal to "Well-posedness and optimal decay rates for the viscoelastic Kirchhoff equation"

2022/03/31 by Alabau-Boussouira, Fatiha
#35A01 #35L20 #93D20 #Analysis of PDEs (math.AP) #FOS: Mathematics #Optimization and Control (math.OC)

paper · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.17050

Abstract

A paper, entitled "Well-posedness and optimal decay rates for the viscoelastic Kirchhoff equation" was published in 2016, in the journal Boletim da Sociedade Paranaense de Matematica. The main results of that paper are stated in Theorem 1.3. Section 2 is devoted to stability estimates for the solutions of the Galerkin approximation (2.1)-(2.2) of (1.2). Section 3 is devoted to the proof of the well-posedness for the Kirchhoff equation (1.2). This rebuttal is written in view to show the major flaws, and gaps in the proofs of this publication.

Related

• Existence, general decay and blow-up of solutions for a viscoelastic Kirchhoff equation with Balakrishnan-Taylor damping and dynamic boundary conditions
• Global existence and decay estimates for the viscoelastic kirchhoff\n equation with a delay term
• Decay estimate in a viscoelastic plate equation with past history, nonlinear damping, and logarithmic nonlinearity
• Stabilization of weakly coupled viscoelastic Kirchhoff plate and wave equations
• Well-posedness and general decay of solution for a transmission problem with viscoelastic term and delay