vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Risques et opportunités liés à la double culture dans le Sud-Ouest de la FranceInnovations agronomiques 94, 212-228

2024/01/01 by Philippe Debaeke, Debaeke, Philippe, Mathieu Abella +27
Agricultural and Biological Sciences · #Agriculture and Rural Development Research #Changement climatique #Climate change #Expérimentation à la ferme #Irrigation #Marge semi-nette #On-farm experiments #Rendement #Semi-net margin #Yield

paper · pdf · doi:10.17180/ciag-2024-vol94-art14

openalex publication_date 2024/01/01 · openalex created_date 2024/06/02 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/01

Abstract

Growing a second crop in a year, either following an early summer harvest (catch crop) or by sowing into the previous autumn-sown crop (relay crop), enables additional production, whether for feed, food or energy purposes. This practice of double cropping can generate additional income while providing support and regulation services. As such, it can be seen as an ecologically intensive form of agriculture, but also as an opportunity offered by climate change. The decision-making process leading to double cropping is based on a number of factors linked to soil and climatic conditions, but also to the expectation of gain and the perception of risk. The CASDAR project "3C2A: Three crops in two years" (2019-2023), which gathered 15 partners (farmers, advisors from chambers of agriculture, engineers from technical institutes, researchers), was set up to create useful references for double cropping in south-western France, encompassing the regions of Nouvelle-Aquitaine and Occitanie. The aim of this article is to illustrate the potential interest of soybean and sunflower as second crops in south-western France by means of a qualitative analysis of farmers' perceptions of the risks and opportunities of this practice, enriched by a 4- year on-farm assessment of the agronomic and economic performances of double cropping (130 fields) and at the experimental station, where a range of varieties were compared over a 3-year period. With the support of agronomic simulation (SPA1 , STICS2 ), it was possible to assess the robustness of the conclusions (feasibility, productivity) over longer climatic sequences, for unexperimented soils, climates and cropping practices, and for climate change scenarios. It was also possible to assess the environmental impacts (water requirements, drainage, nitrate leaching) of catch crops in the South-West.

Related