2024/07/05 by Paul Meurs, Meurs, Paul, M.T.A. van Thoor +1
Arts and Humanities · #Amsterdam #Architektur (DDC 720) #Associés #Chief Government Architect #Cruz y Ortiz arquitectos #Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation #Culture and Science #Foundation Restoration Studio Limburg (SRAL) #Gallery of Honour #Gesamtkunstwerk #Government Buildings Agency (RgD) #Ministry of Education #Night Watch Gallery #P.J.H. Cuypers #Rijksmuseum #Rijksmuseum Amsterdam #Van Hoogevest Architecten #Wilmotte & #bicycle route #building archeological research #colours #courtyards #intervention #passageway #reconstruction #restoration #restoration criteria #transformation
paper · pdf · doi:10.60857/archimaera.6.157-70
openalex publication_date 2024/07/05 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/01
This article focuses on the design process for the transformation of the Rijksmuseum Amsterdam (1885, by P.J.H. Cuypers), with special attention for the evolution of the design by Cruz y Ortiz arquitectos and the associated history of ideas. How did opinions on the intervention evolve from the concept for a masterplan in 1996 to the realized project? To what extent were all those diverse ambitions regarding the city, the monument and the museum realized? What was the role of the designers, not only referring to Cruz y Ortiz, but also to Van Hoogevest Architecten (restoration) and Wilmotte & Associés (interior)? How did the design evolve in a complex and ambitious context involving a great many interested parties, and what effect did this have on the design process from the first sketches to the ultimately realized renovation?