vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Epidemic models with digital and manual contact tracing

2022/11/23 by Britton, Tom, Zhang, Dongni
#FOS: Biological sciences #FOS: Mathematics #Populations and Evolution (q-bio.PE) #Probability (math.PR)

paper · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2211.12869

Abstract

We analyze a Markovian SIR epidemic model where individuals either recover naturally or are diagnosed, leading to isolation and potential contact tracing. Our focus is on digital contact tracing via a tracing app, considering both its standalone use and combination with manual tracing. We prove that as the population size n grows large, the epidemic process converges to a limiting process, which, unlike typical epidemic models, is not a branching process due to dependencies created by contact tracing. However, by grouping to-be-traced individuals into macro-individuals, we derive a multi-type branching process interpretation, allowing computation of the reproduction number R. This is then converted to an individual reproduction number R(ind), which, contrary to R, decays monotonically with the fraction of app-users while both share the same threshold at 1. Finally, we compare digital (only) contact tracing and manual (only) contact tracing, proving that the critical fraction app-users πc required for R=1 is higher than the critical fraction manually contact traced pc for manual tracing.

Related