2026/04/03 by Daniel Sharp · 2 voices · 1 citation
Social Sciences · #Citizenship #Diaspora, migration, transnational identity #Global citizenship #Immigration #Immigration policy #Interdisciplinary Cultural and Social Studies #Migration, Refugees, and Integration #Social citizenship
paper · doi:10.1080/16544951.2026.2660465
published in Ethics & Global Politics 19(2), 11-23 (Taylor & Francis)
openalex publication_date 2026/04/03 · openalex created_date 2026/05/05 · openalex updated_date 2026/06/04
Citizenship regimes are under pressure. Decades of neoliberalism have eroded the social rights that make citizenship into a form of equal membership. Concurrently, democracies have hardened the borders of their citizenship regimes . In this paper, I contend that these two dynamics are interlinked. Based on this diagnosis, I argue that the familiar claim that democracies must choose between broadening and deepening citizenship is, in the long-term, mistaken. Deepening citizenship is necessary for broadening citizenship because economic precarity trengthens support for the far-right. Broadening citizenship is necessary for deepening citizenship because only an inclusive conception of citizenship can counter the neoliberal nationalist ideology that fuels the erosion of social citizenship.