vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Long-Form Information Alignment Evaluation Beyond Atomic Facts

2025/05/21 by Danna Zheng, Mirella Lapata, Zheng, Danna +3 · 1 citation
Materials Science · #Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) #Computation and Language (cs.CL) #FOS: Computer and information sciences #Machine Learning (cs.LG) #Machine Learning in Materials Science

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.15792

openalex publication_date 2025/05/21 · openalex created_date 2025/10/19 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28

Abstract

Information alignment evaluators are vital for various NLG evaluation tasks and trustworthy LLM deployment, reducing hallucinations and enhancing user trust. Current fine-grained methods, like FactScore, verify facts individually but neglect inter-fact dependencies, enabling subtle vulnerabilities. In this work, we introduce MontageLie, a challenging benchmark that constructs deceptive narratives by "montaging" truthful statements without introducing explicit hallucinations. We demonstrate that both coarse-grained LLM-based evaluators and current fine-grained frameworks are susceptible to this attack, with AUC-ROC scores falling below 65%. To enable more robust fine-grained evaluation, we propose DoveScore, a novel framework that jointly verifies factual accuracy and event-order consistency. By modeling inter-fact relationships, DoveScore outperforms existing fine-grained methods by over 8%, providing a more robust solution for long-form text alignment evaluation. Our code and datasets are available at https://github.com/dannalily/DoveScore.

Citations

Cited by

Related