vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Dare to Plagiarize? Plagiarized Painting Recognition and Retrieval

2025/06/29 by Shaoyu Zhou, Zhou, Sophie, Shu Kong +1
Arts and Humanities · Computer Science · Neuroscience · #Aesthetic Perception and Analysis #Art History and Market Analysis #Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV) #FOS: Computer and information sciences #Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.23132

openalex publication_date 2025/06/29 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28

Abstract

Art plagiarism detection plays a crucial role in protecting artists' copyrights and intellectual property, yet it remains a challenging problem in forensic analysis. In this paper, we address the task of recognizing plagiarized paintings and explaining the detected plagarisms by retrieving visually similar authentic artworks. To support this study, we construct a dataset by collecting painting photos and synthesizing plagiarized versions using generative AI, tailored to specific artists' styles. We first establish a baseline approach using off-the-shelf features from the visual foundation model DINOv2 to retrieve the most similar images in the database and classify plagiarism based on a similarity threshold. Surprisingly, this non-learned method achieves a high recognition accuracy of 97.2% but suffers from low retrieval precision 29.0% average precision (AP). To improve retrieval quality, we finetune DINOv2 with a metric learning loss using positive and negative sample pairs sampled in the database. The finetuned model greatly improves retrieval performance by 12% AP over the baseline, though it unexpectedly results in a lower recognition accuracy (92.7%). We conclude with insightful discussions and outline directions for future research.

Citations

Related