2023/04/05 by Brendan Berthold · 8 citations
Economics, Econometrics and Finance · #Ambiguity aversion #Computer science #Econometrics #Economics #Expected utility hypothesis #Financial Markets and Investment Strategies #Financial economics #Market Dynamics and Volatility #Monetary Policy and Economic Impact #Risk aversion (psychology) #Risk premium #Shock (circulatory) #Volatility (finance)
paper · doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2023.104442
published in European Economic Review 154, 104442 (Elsevier BV)
openalex publication_date 2023/04/05 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/14
This paper identifies two types of volatility shocks, namely quantity and price of risk shocks, which can intuitively be interpreted as uncertainty and risk aversion shocks, respectively. Identification is achieved in a shock-restricted SVAR framework using a combination of narrative and external variable restrictions. We find that uncertainty shocks have large negative effects on output, while risk aversion shocks are particularly damaging to asset prices and are deflationary. We also quantify to which extent the endogenous response of risk aversion can exacerbate the effects of uncertainty shocks, thereby providing an estimate of the quantitative relevance of the risk-premium channel of uncertainty shocks. A historical contribution exercise suggests that the GFC is best characterised by a combination of uncertainty and risk aversion shocks, while uncertainty shocks were more important than risk aversion shocks during the COVID pandemic.