2023/02/06 by Pablo Lemos, Adam Coogan, Lemos, Pablo +5 · 19 citations
Computer Science · Mathematics · #Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models #FOS: Computer and information sciences #FOS: Physical sciences #Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference #Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics (astro-ph.IM) #Machine Learning (cs.LG) #Machine Learning (stat.ML) #Markov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods #Methodology (stat.ME)
paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2302.03026
openalex publication_date 2023/02/06 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28
Parameter inference, i.e. inferring the posterior distribution of the parameters of a statistical model given some data, is a central problem to many scientific disciplines. Generative models can be used as an alternative to Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods for conducting posterior inference, both in likelihood-based and simulation-based problems. However, assessing the accuracy of posteriors encoded in generative models is not straightforward. In this paper, we introduce `Tests of Accuracy with Random Points' (TARP) coverage testing as a method to estimate coverage probabilities of generative posterior estimators. Our method differs from previously-existing coverage-based methods, which require posterior evaluations. We prove that our approach is necessary and sufficient to show that a posterior estimator is accurate. We demonstrate the method on a variety of synthetic examples, and show that TARP can be used to test the results of posterior inference analyses in high-dimensional spaces. We also show that our method can detect inaccurate inferences in cases where existing methods fail.
SBi3PCF: Simulation-based inference with the integrated 3PCF