2017/06/21 by Amanda R. Carrico, Kaitlin T. Raimi, Heather Barnes Truelove +1 · 105 citations
Business, Management and Accounting · Environmental Science · Medicine · Psychology · #Behavioral Health and Interventions #Consumption (sociology) #Economics #Environmental Education and Sustainability #Environmental Sustainability in Business #Environmental health #Intervention (counseling) #Medicine #Microeconomics #Population #Psychology #Spillover effect
paper · doi:10.1177/0013916517713067
published in Environment and Behavior 50(7), 723-748 (SAGE Publishing)
openalex publication_date 2017/06/21 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/01
Psychological studies testing behavioral spillover—the notion that behavior change resulting from an intervention affects subsequent similar behaviors—has resulted in conflicting findings in the environmental domain. This study sought to further demarcate the spillover process by asking participants to engage in a difficult first pro-environmental behavior, reducing red meat consumption, for either health or environmental reasons. Evidence of spillover was tested via a subsequent monetary donation to an environmental organization. While there was no evidence of spillover for those in the green behavior condition, those in the health behavior condition were less likely to donate relative to controls. There was evidence that pro-environmental behavior led to an increase in environmental concern. In turn, environmental concern was associated with an increased likelihood of donating. Environmental concern may, thus, be one route to positive spillover in some subsets of the population.