2025/01/05 by S. A. Adedayo, Adedayo, S. A.
Computer Science · Economics, Econometrics and Finance · Mathematics · #Econometrics (econ.EM) #FOS: Computer and information sciences #FOS: Economics and business #Machine Learning (cs.LG) #Machine Learning (stat.ML) #Methodology (stat.ME) #cs.LG #econ.EM #stat.ME #stat.ML
paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.02672
arxiv created 2026/07/30 · arxiv updated 2026/07/31
Granger causality (GC) is widely used to infer directed relationships in time-series data. However, its predictive criterion does not by itself distinguish direct causal effects from dependencies induced by common causes, indirect paths, collider conditioning, or model misspecification. We revisit this limitation by interpreting bivariate and multivariate GC through causal Bayesian networks and Reichenbachs common cause principles. Under explicit graphical assumptions, bivariate GC provides a marginal dependence check, while multivariate GC tests whether the same association persists after conditioning on relevant histories. This view motivates causalised Granger causality (c-GC), which combines the two decisions, and c-GC*, a more conservative variant with a richer conditioning set. We validate both methods on synthetic dynamical systems, established time-series causal discovery benchmarks, Sachs protein-signalling data, and Lorenz-96 simulations. The results show that the proposed criteria recover plausible causal structure in settings with delayed effects, cycles, bidirectional links, and nonlinear or noisy dynamics. The framework clarifies how GC-style inference can be given a causal interpretation without treating temporal prediction alone as sufficient evidence of causation.