vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

An Empirical Survey of the Effectiveness of Debiasing Techniques for Pre-trained Language Models

2021/10/16 by Nicholas Meade, Elinor Poole-Dayan, Meade, Nicholas +3 · 5 citations
Computer Science · #Computation and Language (cs.CL) #FOS: Computer and information sciences #Machine Learning (cs.LG) #Natural Language Processing Techniques #Topic Modeling

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.08527

openalex publication_date 2021/10/16 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28

Abstract

Recent work has shown pre-trained language models capture social biases from the large amounts of text they are trained on. This has attracted attention to developing techniques that mitigate such biases. In this work, we perform an empirical survey of five recently proposed bias mitigation techniques: Counterfactual Data Augmentation (CDA), Dropout, Iterative Nullspace Projection, Self-Debias, and SentenceDebias. We quantify the effectiveness of each technique using three intrinsic bias benchmarks while also measuring the impact of these techniques on a model's language modeling ability, as well as its performance on downstream NLU tasks. We experimentally find that: (1) Self-Debias is the strongest debiasing technique, obtaining improved scores on all bias benchmarks; (2) Current debiasing techniques perform less consistently when mitigating non-gender biases; And (3) improvements on bias benchmarks such as StereoSet and CrowS-Pairs by using debiasing strategies are often accompanied by a decrease in language modeling ability, making it difficult to determine whether the bias mitigation was effective.

Cited by

Related