2025/09/18 by Stephanie G. Yi, Yi, Seungjun, Nguyen, Joakim +16 · 1 citation
Computer Science · Medicine · #Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education #Computation and Language (cs.CL) #FOS: Computer and information sciences #Machine Learning in Healthcare #Topic Modeling
paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.14597
openalex publication_date 2025/09/18 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28
This position paper examines how large language models (LLMs) can support thematic analysis of unstructured clinical transcripts, a widely used but resource-intensive method for uncovering patterns in patient and provider narratives. We conducted a systematic review of recent studies applying LLMs to thematic analysis, complemented by an interview with a practicing clinician. Our findings reveal that current approaches remain fragmented across multiple dimensions including types of thematic analysis, datasets, prompting strategies and models used, most notably in evaluation. Existing evaluation methods vary widely (from qualitative expert review to automatic similarity metrics), hindering progress and preventing meaningful benchmarking across studies. We argue that establishing standardized evaluation practices is critical for advancing the field. To this end, we propose an evaluation framework centered on three dimensions: validity, reliability, and interpretability.