Response to Compagno and Persico

2002/10/11 by V. Hnizdo, Hnizdo, V.
Physics and Astronomy · #Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics #Classical Physics (physics.class-ph) #FOS: Physical sciences #General Physics (physics.gen-ph) #Mechanical and Optical Resonators #Quantum Mechanics and Applications #physics.class-ph #physics.gen-ph

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.physics/0210053

3 pages, REVTeX. This version employs a general analytic proof instead of arguing by using a specific example

openalex publication_date 2002/10/11 · arxiv created 2002/11/14 · arxiv updated 2009/12/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28

Abstract

Some mathematically incorrect claims of Compagno and Persico in their reply (2002 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 35, 8965) to my comment on their recent paper on self-dressing and radiation reaction in classical electrodynamics are pointed out.

Related

• A translation of the paper: On the question of avoiding the infinite\n "self-reaction" of the electron, by V. Ambarzumian and D. Ivanenko (1930)
• Interpretations and naturalness in the radiation-reaction problem
• Answer on the comment by S. G. Karshenboim, V. G. Ivanov and J. Chluba
• A comment on "Radiation reaction reexamined: bound momentum and Schott term" by D.V. Gal'tsov and P. Spirin
• Frisch, Muller and Belot on an Inconsistency in Classical Electrodynamics