2024/10/22 by Mattis van ‘t Schip, Schip, Mattis van 't
Computer Science · Social Sciences · #Blockchain Technology Applications and Security #Computers and Society (cs.CY) #Digitalization, Law, and Regulation #European Criminal Justice and Data Protection #FOS: Computer and information sciences
paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.17296
openalex publication_date 2024/10/22 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28
Many modern consumer devices rely on network connections and cloud services to perform their core functions. This dependency is especially present in Internet of Things (IoT) devices, which combine hardware and software with network connections (e.g., a 'smart' doorbell with a camera). This paper argues that current European product legislation, which aims to protect consumers of, inter alia, IoT devices, has a blind spot for an increasing problem in the competitive IoT market: manufacturer cessation. Without the manufacturer's cloud servers, many IoT devices cannot perform core functions such as data analysis. If an IoT manufacturer ceases their operations, consumers of the manufacturer's devices are thus often left with a dysfunctional device and, as the paper shows, hardly any legal remedies. This paper therefore investigates three properties that could support legislators in finding a solution for IoT manufacturer cessation: i) pre-emptive measures, aimed at ii) manufacturer-independent iii) collective control. The paper finally shows how these three properties already align with current legislative processes surrounding 'interoperability' and open-source software development.