vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Explaining Image Classifiers by Counterfactual Generation

2018/07/20 by Chun‐Hao Chang, Elliot Creager, Chang, Chun-Hao +5 · 8 citations
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology · Computer Science · #Cell Image Analysis Techniques #Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV) #Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) #FOS: Computer and information sciences #Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1807.08024

openalex publication_date 2018/07/20 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28

Abstract

When an image classifier makes a prediction, which parts of the image are relevant and why? We can rephrase this question to ask: which parts of the image, if they were not seen by the classifier, would most change its decision? Producing an answer requires marginalizing over images that could have been seen but weren't. We can sample plausible image in-fills by conditioning a generative model on the rest of the image. We then optimize to find the image regions that most change the classifier's decision after in-fill. Our approach contrasts with ad-hoc in-filling approaches, such as blurring or injecting noise, which generate inputs far from the data distribution, and ignore informative relationships between different parts of the image. Our method produces more compact and relevant saliency maps, with fewer artifacts compared to previous methods.

Cited by

Related