vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

The Formalism-Implementation Gap in Reinforcement Learning Research

2025/10/17 by Pablo Samuel Castro, Castro, Pablo Samuel · 2 voices
Computer Science · Engineering · Neuroscience · #Embodied and Extended Cognition #Reinforcement Learning in Robotics #Robot Manipulation and Learning #cs.AI #cs.LG

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.16175

openalex publication_date 2025/10/17 · openalex created_date 2025/10/22 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28

Abstract

The last decade has seen an upswing in interest and adoption of reinforcement learning (RL) techniques, in large part due to its demonstrated capabilities at performing certain tasks at "super-human levels". This has incentivized the community to prioritize research that demonstrates RL agent performance, often at the expense of research aimed at understanding their learning dynamics. Performance-focused research runs the risk of overfitting on academic benchmarks -- thereby rendering them less useful -- which can make it difficult to transfer proposed techniques to novel problems. Further, it implicitly diminishes work that does not push the performance-frontier, but aims at improving our understanding of these techniques. This paper argues two points: (i) RL research should stop focusing solely on demonstrating agent capabilities, and focus more on advancing the science and understanding of reinforcement learning; and (ii) we need to be more precise on how our benchmarks map to the underlying mathematical formalisms. We use the popular Arcade Learning Environment (ALE; Bellemare et al., 2013) as an example of a benchmark that, despite being increasingly considered "saturated", can be effectively used for developing this understanding, and facilitating the deployment of RL techniques in impactful real-world problems.

Citations

Discussions

Related