vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Federated Continual Graph Learning

2024/11/28 by Yinlin Zhu, Zhu, Yinlin, Miao Hu +3 · 1 citation
Computer Science · Neuroscience · #Advanced Graph Neural Networks #Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) #Brain Tumor Detection and Classification #Databases (cs.DB) #FOS: Computer and information sciences #Machine Learning (cs.LG) #Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data #Social and Information Networks (cs.SI)

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.18919

openalex publication_date 2024/11/28 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28

Abstract

Managing evolving graph data presents substantial challenges in storage and privacy, and training graph neural networks (GNNs) on such data often leads to catastrophic forgetting, impairing performance on earlier tasks. Despite existing continual graph learning (CGL) methods mitigating this to some extent, they rely on centralized architectures and ignore the potential of distributed graph databases to leverage collective intelligence. To this end, we propose Federated Continual Graph Learning (FCGL) to adapt GNNs across multiple evolving graphs under storage and privacy constraints. Our empirical study highlights two core challenges: local graph forgetting (LGF), where clients lose prior knowledge when adapting to new tasks, and global expertise conflict (GEC), where the global GNN exhibits sub-optimal performance in both adapting to new tasks and retaining old ones, arising from inconsistent client expertise during server-side parameter aggregation. To address these, we introduce POWER, a framework that preserves experience nodes with maximum local-global coverage locally to mitigate LGF, and leverages pseudo-prototype reconstruction with trajectory-aware knowledge transfer to resolve GEC. Experiments on various graph datasets demonstrate POWER's superiority over federated adaptations of CGL baselines and vision-centric federated continual learning approaches.

Cited by

Related