vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Are Direct Links Necessary in RVFL NNs for Regression?

2020/03/29 by Grzegorz Dudek, Dudek, Grzegorz
Computer Science · #FOS: Computer and information sciences #Face and Expression Recognition #Machine Learning (cs.LG) #Machine Learning (stat.ML) #Machine Learning and ELM #Neural Networks and Applications

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2003.13090

openalex publication_date 2020/03/29 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28

Abstract

A random vector functional link network (RVFL) is widely used as a universal approximator for classification and regression problems. The big advantage of RVFL is fast training without backpropagation. This is because the weights and biases of hidden nodes are selected randomly and stay untrained. Recently, alternative architectures with randomized learning are developed which differ from RVFL in that they have no direct links and a bias term in the output layer. In this study, we investigate the effect of direct links and output node bias on the regression performance of RVFL. For generating random parameters of hidden nodes we use the classical method and two new methods recently proposed in the literature. We test the RVFL performance on several function approximation problems with target functions of different nature: nonlinear, nonlinear with strong fluctuations, nonlinear with linear component and linear. Surprisingly, we found that the direct links and output node bias do not play an important role in improving RVFL accuracy for typical nonlinear regression problems.

Citations

Related