Is Relational Quantum Mechanics about Facts? If So, Whose? A Reply to Di Biagio and Rovelli's Comment on Brukner and Pienaar

2021/12/15 by Stacey, Blake C. · 1 citation
#FOS: Physical sciences #History and Philosophy of Physics (physics.hist-ph) #Quantum Physics (quant-ph)

paper · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2112.07830

Abstract

Brukner and Pienaar have critiqued the Relational Quantum Mechanics of Rovelli, and together with Di Biagio, the latter has replied. I point out a few places where, in my view, that reply needs clarification.

Cited by

• A Heptalemma for Quantum Mechanics

Related

• Relative facts do not exist. Relational Quantum Mechanics is Incompatible with Quantum Mechanics. Response to the critique by Aurélien Drezet
• What Kind of Relationality does Quantum Mechanics Exhibit?
• A reply to Rovelli's response to our "Assessing Relational Quantum Mechanics''
• In defense of Relational Quantum Mechanics: A note on `Qubits are not observers'
• Relational Quantum Mechanics is Still Incompatible with Quantum Mechanics