Remark on a theorem in Mumford's Red Book of Varieties and Schemes

2016/12/19 by Zhang, Guanglian
#Algebraic Geometry (math.AG) #FOS: Mathematics

paper · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1612.06119

Abstract

In this paper, we firstly point out, by a counter example, that Proposition 6.4 of Section 6 in Bump's book (Algebraic Geometry) is error, and then give a correct statement with proof. We finally point out a gap in the proof of Theorem 3, in Chapter I Section 8, of Mumford's red book, and indicate a way to complete it.

Related

• Mumford's influence on the moduli theory of algebraic varieties
• On Hrushovski's proof of the Manin-Mumford conjecture
• The Mumford-Tate conjecture implies the algebraic Sato-Tate conjecture of Banaszak and Kedlaya
• Remarks on a theorem of Pink in presence of bad reduction
• A note on the Mumford-Tate Conjecture for CM abelian varieties