2014/11/06 by K. Bane, Karl Bane, T. Raubenheimer +2
Engineering · Physics and Astronomy · #Accelerator Physics (physics.acc-ph) #Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods #FOS: Physical sciences #Particle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers #Power Line Communications and Noise #physics.acc-ph
paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1411.1729
5 pages, 4 figures, presented at the 27th Linear Accelerator Conference, Geneva, Switzerland, held August 31--September 5, 2014
arxiv created 2014/11/06 · openalex publication_date 2014/11/06 · arxiv updated 2014/11/07 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28
In LCLS-II, after acceleration and compression and just before entering the undulator, the beam passes through 2.5 km of 24.5 mm (radius) stainless steel pipe. The bunch that passes through the pipe is extremely short---with an rms of 8 um for the nominal 100 pC case. Thus, even though the pipe has a large aperture, the wake that applies is the \it short-range resistive wall wakefield. The bunch distribution is approximately uniform, and therefore the wake induced voltage is characterized by a rather linear voltage chirp. It turns out that the wake supplies needed dechirping to the LCLS-II beam before it enters the undulator. In this note we calculate the wake, discuss the confidence in the calculation, and investigate how to improve the induced chirp linearity and/or strength. Finally, we also study the strength and effects of the transverse (dipole) resistive wall wakefield.