2019/11/09 by Julius Lauw, Dominique Macias, Lauw, Julius +7 · 1 citation
Computer Science · Mathematics · #Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) #FOS: Computer and information sciences #Machine Learning (cs.LG) #Machine Learning (stat.ML) #cs.AI #cs.LG #stat.ML
paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1911.04964
arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1907.06010
arxiv created 2019/11/09 · arxiv updated 2019/11/13
Learning algorithms need bias to generalize and perform better than random guessing. We examine the flexibility (expressivity) of biased algorithms. An expressive algorithm can adapt to changing training data, altering its outcome based on changes in its input. We measure expressivity by using an information-theoretic notion of entropy on algorithm outcome distributions, demonstrating a trade-off between bias and expressivity. To the degree an algorithm is biased is the degree to which it can outperform uniform random sampling, but is also the degree to which is becomes inflexible. We derive bounds relating bias to expressivity, proving the necessary trade-offs inherent in trying to create strongly performing yet flexible algorithms.