vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Right Looks, Wrong Reasons: Compositional Fidelity in Text-to-Image Generation

2025/11/13 by Mayank Vatsa, Vatsa, Mayank, Aparna Bharati +3
Computer Science · #Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) #Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV) #FOS: Computer and information sciences #Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis #Multimodal Machine Learning Applications #Topic Modeling

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.10136

openalex publication_date 2025/11/13 · openalex created_date 2025/11/15 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28

Abstract

The architectural blueprint of today's leading text-to-image models contains a fundamental flaw: an inability to handle logical composition. This survey investigates this breakdown across three core primitives-negation, counting, and spatial relations. Our analysis reveals a dramatic performance collapse: models that are accurate on single primitives fail precipitously when these are combined, exposing severe interference. We trace this failure to three key factors. First, training data show a near-total absence of explicit negations. Second, continuous attention architectures are fundamentally unsuitable for discrete logic. Third, evaluation metrics reward visual plausibility over constraint satisfaction. By analyzing recent benchmarks and methods, we show that current solutions and simple scaling cannot bridge this gap. Achieving genuine compositionality, we conclude, will require fundamental advances in representation and reasoning rather than incremental adjustments to existing architectures.

Related