vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Gradient descent avoids strict saddles with a simple line-search method too

2025/07/18 by Andreea-Alexandra Muşat, Nicolas Boumal, Muşat, Andreea-Alexandra +1
Computer Science · Mathematics · #37C75 #58K05 (Secondary) #90C30 (Primary) 65K05 #Dynamical Systems (math.DS) #FOS: Mathematics #Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows #Markov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods #Numerical Analysis (math.NA) #Optimization and Control (math.OC) #Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.13804

openalex publication_date 2025/07/18 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28

Abstract

It is known that gradient descent (GD) on a C2 cost function generically avoids strict saddle points when using a small, constant step size. However, no such guarantee existed for GD with a line-search method. We provide one for a modified version of the standard Armijo backtracking method with generic, arbitrarily large initial step size. The proof underlines the double role of the Luzin N-1 property for the iteration maps, and allows to forgo the habitual Lipschitz gradient assumption. We extend this to the Riemannian setting (RGD), assuming the retraction is real analytic (though the cost function still only needs to be C2). In closing, we also improve guarantees for RGD with a constant step size in some scenarios.

Citations

Related