2025/04/04 by Mónica Agüero, Bordieu, Juliana, Agüero, Mónica +4
Computer Science · Physics and Astronomy · #FOS: Physical sciences #Quantum Information and Cryptography #Quantum Mechanics and Applications #Quantum Physics (quant-ph) #Quantum and Classical Electrodynamics
paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.03921
openalex publication_date 2025/04/04 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/29
The interpretation of the meaning of Quantum Mechanics has faced controversy since its inception. Bell's inequalities are a touchstone in this controversy. Their observed violation demonstrates that at least one of the hypotheses involved in their derivation and test is false in Nature. In principle, one has to choose between accepting that Locality is false, what implies a possible contradiction with the Theory of Relativity, or accepting that Realism is false, what means to give up the existence of a physical world independent of the observer. The right answer has consequences both foundational and practical, and theoretical discussions have searched it for decades. We report the results of a Bell's experiment designed and performed to add observational information to the discussion. Three proposals to reveal the false hypothesis are carried out, namely: search of attractors in time series of observations, variation of randomness of binary series of outcomes between space-like and not-space-like separated conditions of observation, and test of a bound of Kolmogorov's complexity. The results are consistent with the absence of the specific form of Realism usually involved in the derivation of Bell's inequalities, while remaining compatible with Locality within the sensitivity of the tests. Independently of the foundational problem and of any interpretation, some bare observations have immediate practical impact on the best use of device-independent quantum Random Number Generators and Quantum Key Distribution.