vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Intersectionality: Multiple Group Fairness in Expectation Constraints

2018/11/25 by Jack Fitzsimons, Fitzsimons, Jack, Michael A. Osborne +3 · 1 citation
Computer Science · Social Sciences · #Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning #Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) #Computers and Society (cs.CY) #Ethics and Social Impacts of AI #Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) #FOS: Computer and information sciences #Machine Learning (cs.LG) #Machine Learning (stat.ML)

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1811.09960

openalex publication_date 2018/11/25 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28

Abstract

Group fairness is an important concern for machine learning researchers, developers, and regulators. However, the strictness to which models must be constrained to be considered fair is still under debate. The focus of this work is on constraining the expected outcome of subpopulations in kernel regression and, in particular, decision tree regression, with application to random forests, boosted trees and other ensemble models. While individual constraints were previously addressed, this work addresses concerns about incorporating multiple constraints simultaneously. The proposed solution does not affect the order of computational or memory complexity of the decision trees and is easily integrated into models post training.

Cited by

Related