2021/10/12 by Yangqiaoyu Zhou, Chenhao Tan, Zhou, Yangqiaoyu +1 · 2 citations
Computer Science · Mathematics · #Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) #Artificial intelligence #Computation and Language (cs.CL) #Computer science #Construct (python library) #FOS: Computer and information sciences #Generalization #Hallucinating #Leverage (statistics) #Machine learning #Mathematics #Multimodal Machine Learning Applications #Natural (archaeology) #Natural Language Processing Techniques #Natural language #Natural language processing #Topic Modeling #cs.AI #cs.CL
paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.06223
published in arXiv (Cornell University) (Cornell University) · 8 pages, 4 figures, EMNLPWorkshop on Insights from Negative Results in NLP 2021, data is available at https://github.com/ChicagoHAI/hans-explanations
arxiv created 2021/10/12 · openalex publication_date 2021/10/12 · arxiv updated 2021/10/14 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/05
Although neural models have shown strong performance in datasets such as SNLI, they lack the ability to generalize out-of-distribution (OOD). In this work, we formulate a few-shot learning setup and examine the effects of natural language explanations on OOD generalization. We leverage the templates in the HANS dataset and construct templated natural language explanations for each template. Although generated explanations show competitive BLEU scores against groundtruth explanations, they fail to improve prediction performance. We further show that generated explanations often hallucinate information and miss key elements that indicate the label.