2022/11/22 by Dina Zohrabi Alaee, Alaee, Dina Zohrabi, Benjamin M. Zwickl +1
Health Professions · Social Sciences · #Disability Education and Employment #FOS: Physical sciences #Innovative Education and Learning Practices #Occupational Therapy Practice and Research #Physics Education (physics.ed-ph)
paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2211.12458
openalex publication_date 2022/11/22 · openalex created_date 2022/11/29 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28
In the Summer of 2020, as COVID-19 limited in-person research opportunities and created additional barriers for many students, institutions either canceled or remotely hosted their Research Experience for Undergraduates (REU) programs. The present longitudinal qualitative phenomenographic study was designed to explore some of the possible limitations, challenges and outcomes of this remote experience. Overall, 94 interviews were conducted with paired participants; mentees (N=10) and mentors (N=8) from six different REU programs. By drawing on Cultural-Historical Activity Theory (CHAT) as a framework, our study uncovers some of the challenges for mentees around the accomplishment of their research objectives and academic goals. These challenges included motivation, limited access to technologies at home, limited communication among REU students, barriers in mentor-mentee relationships, and differing expectations about doing research. Despite the challenges, all mentees reported that this experience was highly beneficial. Comparisons between outcomes of these remote REUs and published outcomes of in-person undergraduate research programs reveal many similar benefits such as integrating students into STEM culture. Our study suggests that remote research programs could be considered as a means to expand access to research experiences for undergraduate students even after COVID-19 restrictions have been lifted.