vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

FUSQA: Fetal Ultrasound Segmentation Quality Assessment

2023/03/08 by Sevim Cengiz, Cengiz, Sevim, Ibrahim Almakk +3 · 1 citation
Computer Science · Medicine · #Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV) #Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning #FOS: Computer and information sciences #FOS: Electrical engineering #Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders #Image and Video Processing (eess.IV) #Machine Learning (cs.LG) #Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics #electronic engineering #information engineering

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.04418

openalex publication_date 2023/03/08 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28

Abstract

Deep learning models have been effective for various fetal ultrasound segmentation tasks. However, generalization to new unseen data has raised questions about their effectiveness for clinical adoption. Normally, a transition to new unseen data requires time-consuming and costly quality assurance processes to validate the segmentation performance post-transition. Segmentation quality assessment efforts have focused on natural images, where the problem has been typically formulated as a dice score regression task. In this paper, we propose a simplified Fetal Ultrasound Segmentation Quality Assessment (FUSQA) model to tackle the segmentation quality assessment when no masks exist to compare with. We formulate the segmentation quality assessment process as an automated classification task to distinguish between good and poor-quality segmentation masks for more accurate gestational age estimation. We validate the performance of our proposed approach on two datasets we collect from two hospitals using different ultrasound machines. We compare different architectures, with our best-performing architecture achieving over 90% classification accuracy on distinguishing between good and poor-quality segmentation masks from an unseen dataset. Additionally, there was only a 1.45-day difference between the gestational age reported by doctors and estimated based on CRL measurements using well-segmented masks. On the other hand, this difference increased and reached up to 7.73 days when we calculated CRL from the poorly segmented masks. As a result, AI-based approaches can potentially aid fetal ultrasound segmentation quality assessment and might detect poor segmentation in real-time screening in the future.

Cited by

Related