2019/10/12 by Samuel Goldstein, Goldstein, Samuel, Zhenhong Hu +3 · 3 citations
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology · Neuroscience · Psychology · #Algorithm #Artificial intelligence #Artificial neural network #Cognition #Computer science #Decoding methods #EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces #Electroencephalography #Encoding (memory) #FOS: Biological sciences #Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies #Neural dynamics and brain function #Neurons and Cognition (q-bio.NC) #Neuroscience #Pattern recognition (psychology) #Psychology #Recurrent neural network #Speech recognition #Task (project management) #Working memory #q-bio.NC
paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.05621
published in arXiv (Cornell University) (Cornell University)
arxiv created 2019/10/12 · openalex publication_date 2019/10/12 · arxiv updated 2019/10/15 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/06
Working memory (WM) is a mechanism that temporarily stores and manipulates information in service of behavioral goals and is a highly dynamic process. Previous studies have considered decoding WM load using EEG but have not investigated the contribution of sequential information contained in the temporal patterns of the EEG data that can differentiate different WM loads. In our study, we develop a novel method of investigating the role of sequential information in the manipulation and storage of verbal information at various time scales and localize topographically the sources of the sequential information based decodability. High density EEG (128-channel) were recorded from twenty subjects performing a Sternberg verbal WM task with varying memory loads. Long Short-Term Memory Recurrent Neural Networks (LSTM-RNN) were trained to decode memory load during encoding, retention, activity-silent, and retrieval periods. Decoding accuracy was compared between ordered data and a temporally shuffled version that retains pattern based information of the data but not temporal relation to assess the contribution of sequential information to decoding memory load. The results show that (1) decoding accuracy increases with increase in the length of the EEG time series given to the LSTM for both ordered and temporally shuffled cases, with the increase being faster for ordered than temporally shuffled time series, and (2) according to the decoding weight maps, the frontal, temporal and some parietal areas are an important source of sequential information based decodability. This study, to our knowledge, is the first study applying a LSTM-RNN approach to investigate temporal dynamics in human EEG data in encoding WM load information.