2021/02/11 by Xu Cai, Cai, Xu, Selwyn Gomes +3 · 3 citations
Chemistry · Computer Science · Decision Sciences · Mathematics · #Action (physics) #Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research #Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms #Biology #Botany #Chemistry #Computational chemistry #Computer science #Econometrics #FOS: Computer and information sciences #FOS: Mathematics #Gaussian #Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference #Gaussian process #Identification (biology) #Information Theory (cs.IT) #Machine Learning (cs.LG) #Machine Learning (stat.ML) #Machine learning #Mathematical optimization #Mathematics #Optimization and Control (math.OC) #Physics #Process (computing) #Regret #cs.IT #cs.LG #math.IT #math.OC #stat.ML
paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2102.05793
published in arXiv (Cornell University) (Cornell University) · ICML 2021
openalex publication_date 2021/02/11 · arxiv created 2021/05/26 · arxiv updated 2021/05/27 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28
In this paper, we study the problem of Gaussian process (GP) bandits under relaxed optimization criteria stating that any function value above a certain threshold is "good enough". On the theoretical side, we study various \em lenient regret notions in which all near-optimal actions incur zero penalty, and provide upper bounds on the lenient regret for GP-UCB and an elimination algorithm, circumventing the usual O(√(T)) term (with time horizon T) resulting from zooming extremely close towards the function maximum. In addition, we complement these upper bounds with algorithm-independent lower bounds. On the practical side, we consider the problem of finding a single "good action" according to a known pre-specified threshold, and introduce several good-action identification algorithms that exploit knowledge of the threshold. We experimentally find that such algorithms can often find a good action faster than standard optimization-based approaches.